Data Breach Notification Deadlines by Jurisdiction
Seventy-two hours is the number everyone remembers. The laws differ on what starts the clock, who must be told, and whether an IT provider reports at all.
Short answer
Data breach notification deadlines range from 4 hours to 60 days. The EU and UK GDPR allow 72 hours to tell the regulator, NIS2 requires an early warning within 24 hours, and DORA sets 4 hours after classification. US rules give 4 business days for SEC filings, 30 days in California, New York and Florida, and 60 days under HIPAA.
Key points
- GDPR's 72 hours run from when the controller becomes aware, and the report goes to the regulator, not to individuals.
- A processor or IT provider reports to its customer under GDPR, without undue delay, not to the regulator.
- NIS2 has three steps: an early warning in 24 hours, a notification in 72, and a final report a month later.
- California, New York and Florida each set a 30-day outer limit for telling affected people.
- CIRCIA's 72-hour rule is not in force, and a proposed EU change to 96 hours is not law.

After a breach, the first hard question is how long you have. The honest answer is that it depends on where the affected people are, what kind of organisation you are, and which law you fall under. Several clocks can run at once.
This page collects the data breach notification deadlines from the legal texts themselves. Each row was read on 13 Nov 2026 and links to the clause. It is a reference, not legal advice: for a live incident, take advice from a lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction.
Data breach notification deadlines at a glance
The table lists the time allowed to tell the regulator and the time allowed to tell the people affected. They are often different.
| Regime | What starts the clock | Regulator | Affected individuals |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU GDPR | Controller becomes aware | 72 hours, where feasible | Without undue delay, if high risk |
| UK GDPR | Controller becomes aware | 72 hours, where feasible | Without undue delay, if high risk |
| EU NIS2 | Aware of a significant incident | 24 hours, then 72 hours, then one month | Where appropriate, without undue delay |
| EU DORA | Incident classified as major | 4 hours, then 72 hours, then one month | Clients, without undue delay |
| US SEC rule | Incident judged material | Public filing in 4 business days | Not applicable |
| US HIPAA | Discovery of the breach | With individual notice if 500 or more | 60 calendar days |
| US FTC Safeguards Rule | Discovery, 500 or more consumers | 30 days | None in this rule |
| California | Discovery or notification | 15 days after consumer notice | 30 calendar days |
| New York | Discovery of the breach | No day count | 30 days |
| Florida | Determination of the breach | 30 days, if 500 or more | 30 days |
| Canada PIPEDA | Breach determined, real risk of harm | As soon as feasible | As soon as feasible |
| Australia | Aware of a suspected breach | 30 days to assess, then promptly | As soon as practicable |
Three more regimes are covered below with caveats: New Zealand, Singapore and South Africa. Two widely quoted rules are not yet in force and have their own section.
European Union and United Kingdom
GDPR: 72 hours, to the regulator
Article 33 of the GDPR says the controller must notify the supervisory authority "without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it". Three details are often missed:
- The clock starts on awareness, not on the date of the breach.
- No report is needed if the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to people's rights and freedoms.
- A late report is allowed but must be "accompanied by reasons for the delay".
Individuals are a separate duty under Article 34, triggered only when the breach is likely to result in a high risk to them.
The UK kept the same wording after leaving the EU. The ICO's guide puts it as "not later than 72 hours after becoming aware of it".
One UK rule did change. Telecoms and internet service providers report under regulation 5A of PECR, which allowed 24 hours until 20 August 2025 and now allows 72.
NIS2: three reports, not one
NIS2 covers "essential" and "important" entities in sectors such as energy, health, digital infrastructure and managed IT services. Article 23 sets a sequence:
- Early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident.
- Incident notification within 72 hours, with an initial assessment.
- Final report within one month of the notification.
NIS2 is a directive, so each member state writes it into national law, and details vary by country. What counts as "significant" for digital providers is defined in Implementing Regulation 2024/2690. For a managed service provider, one test is that the service "is completely unavailable for more than 30 minutes".
DORA: four hours for financial firms
Banks, insurers, investment firms and their kind report major incidents under DORA. The timings are in Delegated Regulation 2025/301: an initial notification "within four hours from the classification" of the incident as major and no later than 24 hours from becoming aware of it. An intermediate report follows within 72 hours of that, and a final report within a month.
United States
There is no single federal breach law. A company can fall under a sector rule, a securities rule and several state laws for the same incident.
Federal rules
- SEC, public companies. Form 8-K Item 1.05 must be filed "within four business days after the registrant determines that it has experienced a material cybersecurity incident". The final rule took effect in September 2023. The clock starts at the materiality decision, which must itself be made without unreasonable delay.
- HIPAA, health data. The Breach Notification Rule requires notice to individuals "without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery". Breaches of 500 or more people are reported to the government at the same time; smaller ones are reported after the end of the calendar year.
- FTC Safeguards Rule, non-bank financial firms. 16 CFR 314.4(j) requires notice to the FTC "as soon as possible, and no later than 30 days after discovery" where at least 500 consumers are involved. That paragraph took effect in May 2024.
State laws
Every state has its own law. Three large ones now share a 30-day outer limit for telling affected residents.
| State | Deadline for affected residents | Regulator | Clause |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 30 calendar days from discovery or notification | Attorney General within 15 days of consumer notice, if over 500 residents | Civil Code 1798.82 |
| New York | 30 days after discovery | Attorney General and two other state bodies, no day count | General Business Law 899-aa |
| Florida | 30 days after determination | Department of Legal Affairs within 30 days, if 500 or more | Statutes 501.171 |
California's 30-day limit is new, in effect since 1 January 2026. New York's allows delay only for law enforcement. Florida's allows 15 more days for good cause.
Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa
These laws avoid a fixed number of hours.
- Canada. PIPEDA section 10.1 requires a report "as soon as feasible after the organization determines that the breach has occurred", where there is a real risk of significant harm.
- Australia. The regulator's guidance describes a duty to assess a suspected breach within 30 days, then notify as soon as practicable.
- New Zealand. The law says as soon as practicable. The Privacy Commissioner adds an expectation: "Ideally you'll do that within 72 hours".
- South Africa. POPIA section 22 requires notice "as soon as reasonably possible after the discovery of the compromise".
Rules often quoted that are not in force
Two deadlines appear in many articles as if they applied today.
CIRCIA, United States. The 2022 act sets 72 hours for covered cyber incidents and 24 hours for ransom payments by critical-infrastructure entities. CISA's page says reporting "will not be required until the CIRCIA final rule goes into effect", and that it "continues to work on the final rule".
A 96-hour GDPR clock. In November 2025 the European Commission proposed changing Article 33 to 96 hours and raising the threshold to high-risk breaches. EUR-Lex lists the procedure as ongoing. Until it is adopted, the deadline is 72 hours.
India's new data protection rules, notified in November 2025, also contain a 72-hour breach rule that does not start until eighteen months after publication.
Does an IT provider have to report?
This is the question managed service providers ask most, and the answer changes by law.
Under GDPR, a provider handling a customer's data is a processor. Article 33(2) is short: "The processor shall notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach." The provider tells its customer. The customer tells the regulator.
Under NIS2, a provider can be in scope itself. Managed service providers and managed security service providers are named in the implementing regulation, and an in-scope provider reports its own significant incidents.
In the US, the provider's duty usually runs to its customer too, with different clocks: 60 days for a HIPAA business associate, 30 days in New York, 10 days for a third-party agent in Florida, and "immediately following discovery" in California.
What to prepare before an incident
- List which regimes apply to you. Where your customers and staff live, your sector, and whether you are listed on a stock exchange.
- Decide who declares "aware". The clock starts there, so the decision needs a named owner.
- Keep the regulator's reporting form to hand for each regime on your list.
- Check your contracts. Customer contracts and card-brand rules often set shorter deadlines than the law.
- Know what was exposed. A current backup helps you work out what was lost; see Microsoft 365 backup pricing compared.
- Reduce the odds. Many breaches begin with a flaw already known to be exploited. How small teams can use the CISA KEV catalog covers what to patch first.
- Close the easy routes in. Spoofed email is one of them; see what Google, Yahoo and Microsoft require for SPF, DKIM and DMARC.
How these clauses were read, and what a desk-research label means, is set out on the methodology page.
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)
EUR-Lex. Checked . - Personal data breaches: a guide
UK Information Commissioner's Office. Checked . - Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, regulation 5A
legislation.gov.uk. Checked . - Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
EUR-Lex. Checked . - Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690
EUR-Lex. Checked . - Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301 (DORA incident reporting)
EUR-Lex. Checked . - Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure (final rule)
US Federal Register. Checked . - 45 CFR Part 164 Subpart D: Notification in the Case of Breach of Unsecured Protected Health Information
US Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Checked . - 16 CFR Part 314: Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information
US Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Checked . - Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA)
CISA. Checked . - California Civil Code section 1798.82
California Legislative Information. Checked . - New York General Business Law section 899-aa
New York State Senate. Checked . - Florida Statutes section 501.171
Florida Senate. Checked . - PIPEDA section 10.1
Justice Laws Website, Government of Canada. Checked . - Notifiable Data Breach scheme guidance, part 4
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. Checked . - Notify us of a privacy breach
New Zealand Privacy Commissioner. Checked . - Proposal for a Digital Omnibus Regulation, COM(2025) 837
EUR-Lex. Checked .
Questions readers ask
When does the 72-hour clock start?
Under the EU and UK GDPR it starts when the controller has become aware of the breach, not when the breach happened. Under NIS2 it starts on becoming aware of a significant incident. Under DORA the 72 hours for the intermediate report run from the initial notification, which is a different starting point.
Does an IT provider or processor have to report a breach?
Under GDPR a processor notifies the controller, its customer, without undue delay, and the controller reports to the regulator. Under NIS2 a managed service provider that is in scope reports in its own right. US laws vary: HIPAA gives a business associate 60 days to tell the covered entity, and Florida gives a third-party agent 10 days.
What if we do not have all the facts by the deadline?
Report what you know. GDPR allows information to be provided in phases without undue further delay, and requires reasons if the first report is late. The SEC rule lets a company say what is not yet determined and amend the filing later. Waiting for a complete picture is not a recognised reason to miss the deadline.
Do affected people always have to be told?
No. Under GDPR individuals must be told only when the breach is likely to result in a high risk to them, with exceptions such as encrypted data. Canada's test is a real risk of significant harm. In the US state laws listed here, telling individuals is the main duty and the deadline applies to that.


